New altitude-adjusted pace calculator

I just released a new web app for calculating altitude-adjusted pace! If you live at altitude and are traveling to sea level, or vice versa, it’s a super helpful tool for training and racing. 

🏔️ Try my new altitude-adjusted pace calculator here!

Unlike other altitude calculators, my new altitude-adjusted pace app can explicitly account for what altitude you live and train at. So, if you live at 6,000 feet, run a 5k at 5,000 feet, and want to know what you could have run at sea level, my new web app will tell you! 

The key insight behind this calculator is treating every race at a different altitude as a “natural experiment” – after factoring out the effects of things like wind, weather, and terrain, the statistical model that powers the calculator estimates the independent effect of the altitude of the race, then applies a “discount” based on what altitude the athlete lives and trains at. 

That discount gets more pronounced at higher elevations: if you live and train at 3,000 feet (900 m) above sea level, acclimation to altitude does not make much of a difference. However, at 7,000 feet (2,100 m) it really matters! 

One nice thing about this calculator is that the empirical results match very well with what we’d expect from the physiology of different events: longer events should be impacted more heavily, and once you get to an “aerobic saturation point”—where >95% of the event’s energy is coming from aerobic metabolism—you should see more or less a constant effect as the event gets longer. 

That’s exactly what my altitude-adjusted pace calculator produces: 

And you also see an increasing “badness” of altitude at particularly high elevations, which is exactly what you would expect given that the same pattern appears in scientific studies on how VO2max changes at different altitudes: 

There’s clearly a worsening of the impact of altitude when you get very high up, and my altitude-adjusted calculator picks up a similar effect.

Comparing my altitude adjusted pace calculator to the NCAA track altitude conversion factors

One other interesting comparison to make is to look at my calculator’s predictions versus the now-retired NCAA conversion factors, which until recently were used in American collegiate track to convert high altitude performances to a sea-level equivalent for the purposes of determining entries into championship meets. 

My calculator is pretty similar at 800m and 1500m / one mile, and differs more sharply at 3k and 5k. The 10k is somewhat closer. These NCAA factors date to the early 1980s, and (as the figure below shows) were only applied above 3,000 feet. 

The differences are interesting to examine at 10k, where my model agrees with the NCAA model at very high altitudes, but differs at moderate altitudes: 

As I say in the explainer to the altitude-adjusted pace calculator, even though I believe my calculator is significantly more accurate than the old NCAA conversion factors, I do not recommend using my web app for converting performances for the purpose, since a lot more goes into deciding on championship qualification criteria than merely the physiology of altitude.  

🏔️ Try out my new altitude-adjusted calculator here! 

Learn more about the science of running

If you want to learn more about the science of running, subscribe to my free email newsletter! It's the best way to find out when I have new content coming out.

If you are training for the marathon (or hope to train for one soon), you should also check out my book, Marathon Excellence for Everyone. It covers how to adjust training for heat, hills, and other factors as well.

Learn more about Marathon Excellence here, or get the book now on Amazon. If you live outside of the United States, Marathon Excellence is also available in a Metric Edition with all workouts in kilometers.

I also have a shorter book from back in 2013 that covers a simple, scientifically based approach to training for distances from the 800m to the 10k, Modern Training and Physiology. Check it out if you're interested!

You can also follow me on X/Twitter at @jdruns, on Instagram at @runningwritings, or you can subscribe to my YouTube channel, but the best way to stay in touch is definitely my email list.

Related articles

New web app: Predicting LT1 pace and Zone 2 pace from 5k time

I’m excited to launch a new app for predicting training paces: my LT1 and Zone 2 pace calculator is now live, and provides a simple and accurate way to estimate your first lactate threshold, or LT1 pace, as well as an upper limit for your easy run pace, a.k.a. Zone 2 pace.  📲 Check out ... Read more

Designing a plyometrics program for improving bone strength in young runners

Stress fractures are an incredibly frustrating injury, especially for young runners. Even though the science behind recovery from stress fractures—more properly called “bone stress injuries”—has advanced significantly in the last several years, sustaining a bone stress injury can still completely derail your season. Of course, far better than a swift rehabilitation is simply not getting ... Read more

Three theories of tissue damage accumulation during running

Suppose you need to run 15 miles (24 km) in the next week. You can distribute this volume however you want, both within and across days. Your goal is to cover the requisite distance in a way that minimizes your risk of injury. Does it matter how you schedule out your week? This is one ... Read more
John Davis lecturing about marathon science

Lecture: The science behind modern marathon training

I just posted the video from my live lecture on the science of modern marathon training!  In the video, I uncover the science behind the modern approach to marathon training, including how VO2max, running economy, lactate threshold, and physiological resilience each contribute to marathon performance. Then, I explore the training methods that most effectively target ... Read more

What assumptions are baked into your race prediction model?

After launching my power law calculator earlier this week I got a couple emails from readers who noticed some counter-intuitive behavior. Suppose you have an athlete who has run 800m in 2:25 and 1600m in 5:10. The power law calculator predicts a 3200m performance of 11:03—pretty reasonable.  Then suppose your athlete improves their 800m time ... Read more

Tendons do not store energy for free

Very often, in training discussions online and in books—even sports science textbooks—you encounter the claim that, during running, tendons stretch out and store up energy on impact with the ground, releasing that energy later when you push off the ground. This energy storage improves your running economy, because without it, you’d have to produce that ... Read more

In windy conditions, running at a constant effort is usually better than running at a constant speed

Suppose you are running a 5k race on an out-and-back course, and there’s a strong headwind on the way out—should you aim to run at the same effort the whole way, allowing the wind to slow you down on the way out and speed you up on the way back? Or should you maintain the ... Read more

A comprehensive guide to the science of cadence for runners

Your cadence is the number of steps you take per minute while running. Simple measurement, right? But there are many questions surrounding it, including how it differs across runners, how it changes as you run faster, whether a higher cadence is more efficient, whether a lower cadence causes injury, and whether you should aim for ... Read more

About the Author

John J. Davis, Ph.D.

I have been coaching runners and writing about training and injuries for over 12 years. I've helped complete novices, NXN-qualifying high schoolers, elite-field competitors at major marathons, and runners everywhere in between. I have a Ph.D. in Human Performance, and I do scientific research focused on the biomechanics of overuse injuries in runners. My new book on marathon training, Marathon Excellence for Everyone, is now available on Amazon!

Leave a Comment

Check out my new book on marathon training!