I’ve written a lot about what I’m now calling full-spectrum training, i.e. percentage-based training in the style of Renato Canova and other members of the “Italian School” of training.
We can talk theory all day, but sometimes it helps to see what building a real schedule looks like from the ground up. To that end, I recently received the following email, lightly edited and anonymized:
I’ve just recently came across your website while looking into Canova-type training and have read a few other topics that you have delved into in great detail!
The last few years I really got into strict Lydiard-type training and while I found this training has really helped me, I think I am at a stage where I need to start looking at different types of training techniques. Hence I came across Canova or percentage type training.
I believe percentage-based training has helped me, but am probably struggling to write a plan for myself. I am looking to aim for a 10 km and want to see if you can give me any guidance on how to structure my training for it. I am keen to get a grip of this myself so I know how to write a plan up for various distances.
I started typing out a response, and quickly realized that it would work better as a full article, since I get a lot of questions like this.
So, here it is: a guide to building a 10k training program from scratch, using the full-spectrum percentage-based approach. This isn’t “the” way to train for the 10k, but it is a way, and one that is in keeping with the modern, full-spectrum, percentage-based approach.
This is also not “the Canova method,” but my method, one that’s certainly been influenced by Canova’s approach, but that also has some important differences and other influences as well.