After launching my power law calculator earlier this week I got a couple emails from readers who noticed some counter-intuitive behavior.
Suppose you have an athlete who has run 800m in 2:25 and 1600m in 5:10. The power law calculator predicts a 3200m performance of 11:03—pretty reasonable.
Then suppose your athlete improves their 800m time to 2:20. Enter that into the calculator instead and you get a 3200m time of 11:26—which is slower than their predicted 3200m time before! This seems wrong: shouldn’t the runner now be able to run faster over 3200m as well?
Now, this wouldn’t be the first time a reader spotted a subtle issue with one of my calculators, but in this case, the calculator is working correctly, under the assumptions baked into the model. Here’s the intuition:
Suppose you had two different athletes: Fast-Twitch Frannie, who runs 1600m in 5:10 and 800m in 2:20, and Slow-Twitch Sally, who can also run 5:10 for 1600m, but can only run 800m in 2:25. If these two athletes race over 3200m, who will win?